Prince Edward County is considering revising plans for new water infrastructure.
During Thursday’s committee of the whole meeting, the committee heard a report on projected population growth for the county, and related plans to build out county water infrastructure.
The report highlighted two models for population growth. The first was based on a 2023 study, and indicated a high growth rate of 2.3%. A more recent study in 2025 indicated a high growth rate of 1%, which factored new conditions such as reduced immigration targets and external economic pressures.
The committee was presented with a motion to have municipal staff evaluate the existing infrastructure plans and what it would take to adopt the 1% growth model. The motion also called for engagement with developers waiting for new water capacity and evaluations of existing water and wastewater plants to determine their condition and remaining service life.
Several members of the community also spoke during the public comments section of the meeting. Area residents expressed concerns that with lower population growth, development charges wouldn’t cover the infrastructure costs, sticking water users with the bill. Several developers also offered comments, saying they were ready to build once water capacity was available.
After the presentation, and public comments, the committee began a significant debate over how to proceed.
Councillor Chris Braney said his constituents were worried about being stuck holding the bill for expensive projects.
“For four years now, all I’ve heard is this book of fairy tales about growth pays for growth. I think we have a better chance of seeing a frog turn into a prince than seeing the scenarios that I’ve heard around this table,” said Councillor Braney.
Councillor Phil St-Jean said that he thought that the 1% model was too low, and expected more growth than that. He also warned about the hazards of delaying action too long.
“We have to be very careful about that, how we move forward with the money the province has given us,” said Councillor St-Jean. “Otherwise, we’re going to have another Picton sewage treatment plant scenario. Because of massive delays and foot dragging and not having correct information, this community lost millions of dollars from the province, and that’s why the Picton waste treatment plant was excessively expensive.”
After debate, an amendment was proposed to have modular solutions considered for extending the life of existing plants when evaluating their condition, along with adding public consultation to the planned consultation with developers. That amendment passed unanimously.
The motion passed as amended, and was sent on to council for final approval.
